Understanding the Sycamore Gap Trial: Criminal Charges and Legal Implications

The Case So Far

The felling of the iconic Sycamore Gap tree, which stood for over a century on Hadrian’s Wall, shocked people across the UK and beyond. In September 2023, the beloved landmark was allegedly cut down in the dead of night. The trial of two men accused of causing criminal damage is currently taking place at Newcastle Crown Court.

The Background

The tree, which had stood since the 1800s, was a globally recognised feature of the Northumberland landscape. Its unexpected destruction prompted not only public outcry but also an in-depth police investigation that has led to two men being charged and now standing trial.

What Are the Charges?

Criminal Damage Allegations

Daniel Graham, 39, and Adam Carruthers, 32, both deny charges of criminal damage related to the destruction of the Sycamore Gap tree and part of Hadrian’s Wall. The case centres around allegations that one man felled the tree using a chainsaw, while the other filmed it.

Legal Definition of Criminal Damage

Under UK law, criminal damage includes intentionally or recklessly destroying or damaging property belonging to another. In this case, the damage also affects a protected historical site, potentially elevating the seriousness of the offence.

Potential Penalties

If found guilty, the defendants could face significant penalties. Sentencing for criminal damage can vary, but where heritage or protected property is involved, courts may consider harsher punishment. This could include imprisonment, community orders, or substantial fines.

Key Evidence Presented

The Chainsaw Video

Jurors have viewed a video said to show the tree being cut down, which prosecutors claim was found on Mr Graham’s phone. Metadata indicates it was recorded at the exact location of the Sycamore Gap tree shortly after midnight on 27 September 2023.

The Wood Wedge

A wedge of wood believed to have come from the tree was photographed in the back of a car linked to the accused. Expert testimony suggests a strong likelihood that this wedge was cut from the Sycamore Gap tree using a forestry technique known as “hinge-and-wedge.”

Tracking Movements

Cell site analysis and ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) data presented in court show the movement of the accused’s vehicle from Carlisle to the scene and back. CCTV footage and mobile phone activity support the prosecution’s timeline.

The Defence’s Position

What the Defendants Say

So far, only Mr Graham has given evidence. He claims he was asleep in his caravan while his vehicle—and allegedly his phone—were taken by Mr Carruthers without his knowledge. Mr Carruthers has denied ever cutting down a tree and disputes all claims.

Disputing the Evidence

The defendants have highlighted gaps in the investigation, such as the lack of a recovered chainsaw or the wooden wedge. Their legal teams argue that the available evidence is circumstantial and does not definitively prove guilt.

Why This Case Matters

Implications for Public Heritage

The Sycamore Gap trial underscores how seriously UK law treats damage to historic and culturally significant sites. Beyond the emotional reaction from the public, the case highlights the criminal justice system’s role in protecting national heritage.

Awaiting the Verdict

As the trial continues, it’s important to remember that both men are innocent until proven guilty. The legal process is ongoing, and any final verdict will be based on the evidence presented in court.

How We Can Help

At Morton’s Solicitors, if you or someone you know is facing accusations of criminal damage or similar offences, professional legal advice is essential. Call us directly on 0161 230 4816 or email us via our contact page for fast, confidential advice.